Kwak Hyeon-hwa's impression after winning some of Son Bae-so's comments "Thank you for your support"
Kwak Hyeon-hwa's impression after winning some of Son Bae-so's comments "Thank you for your support"
  • 승인 2020.09.23 21:08
  • 댓글 0
이 기사를 공유합니다

On the 23rd, Kwak Hyun-hwa shared his impressions on SNS while comedian Kwak Hyun-hwa won some damages lawsuit against film director Lee Soo-seong, who distributed a film containing exposed scenes without the consent of the actors. / Photo = Kwak Hyun-hwa SNS
On the 23rd, Kwak Hyun-hwa shared his impressions on SNS while comedian Kwak Hyun-hwa won some damages lawsuit against film director Lee Soo-seong, who distributed a film containing exposed scenes without the consent of the actors. / Photo = Kwak Hyun-hwa SNS

Comedian Kwak Hyeon-hwa shared his feelings on social media while winning some damages lawsuit against film director Lee Soo-seong, who distributed a film containing exposed scenes for a fee without the consent of the actor.

He accepted the results of the trial on the 23rd and said,'We won. Thank you for supporting me.'

In April 2012, Kwak Hyeon-hwa signed a contract to appear in the movie'House with a Good View' directed by Lee Soo-sung. At the time, Kwak Hyeon-hwa said that it was possible to expose the back, but not the entire chest, but director Lee Soo-sung persuaded Kwak Hyeon-hwa to persuade him, saying, "Exposing the upper body is an essential part in the flow of the play. The scene was filmed.

However, after shooting, Kwak Hyeon-hwa refused to disclose the exposure scene, and the movie was released as a version with the scene removed.

The problem occurred when director Lee Soo-seong sold a version containing Kwak Hyun-hwa's exposure to film investments and distributors, Internet file sharing sites, and IPTVs under the name of the director's version. Kwak Hyeon-hwa sued Director Lee Soo-seong.

Previously, director Lee Soo-seong was handed over to the trial for violation of the special law on the punishment of sexual violence crimes (using cameras, etc.), but the first trial was acquitted, saying, "It is difficult to see that it was a definite promise to exclude the exposure scenes." Later, he was found not guilty in the Supreme Court.

However, Kwak Hyun-hwa filed a lawsuit for compensation for damages, saying, "It was agreed not to use the exposed scenes in the movie, but without consent, we distributed an unresolved version to infringe on the moral rights. Even after the protest, we sued for innocence and committed a second offense." Worked.

On the same day, Judge Lee Ye-rim, who was solely responsible for the civil affairs of the Seoul Central District Court, ruled to compensate 20 million won in a lawsuit filed by Kwak Hyun-hwa against director Lee Soo-sung.

The court judged that director Lee Soo-seong had violated Kwak Hyeon-hwa's moral rights, and believed that it was responsible for compensation for alimony. Judge Lee Ye-rim said, "It cannot be said that Kwak Hyeon-hwa agreed or allowed the use of the results, such as the distribution of the results at the time of shooting the exposure scene. Rather, after the two people finished filming, they planned to discuss again in the editing stage, It should be viewed as responding to," he said. However, only 20 million won for alimony was recognized, without recognizing any damages to property that Kwak Hyeon-hwa claimed.

Director Lee Soo-sung argued that "the exposure scenes were filmed with sufficient consultation, and as long as they agreed to the filming, they have the right to use them as the exclusive right of the filming results according to the contract," and "Kwak Hyun-hwa unfairly sued and spread false facts." .

[News Inside Reporter Kang Haru news@newsinside.kr]

위 기사는 AI가 자동으로 번역한 기사입니다.

[한국어기사보기]